Bucharest
The 3rd of April 2010
1. European Union (E.U.) is an economical and
political union with 27 countries, located primarily in Europe. But there are
also 22 European countries that are remaining outside, most part of them
situated in the Balkans region and Eastern Europe.
2. Europe experienced a period of 11 years of
peace, the last conflict taking place in the Balkans region with NATO and
Serbia on opposite sides. This war was carried out without approval by
the UN Security Council and the pretext used was the unwillingness to reach
agreement of Serbia with the Albanian separatists in Kosovo and the ethnic
cleansing carried out by them.
3. The Treaty establishing a Constitution
(TCE) was an unratified international treaty intended to create a Constitution
for the E.U. He was signed on 29 October 2004 by representatives of the then 25
member states by means of parliamentary votes or referendums. Austria, Belgium,
Bulgaria, Cyprus, Estonia, Finland, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania,
Luxembourg, Malta, Romania, Slovenia and Spain were the countries that ratified
the Constitution of E.U. Germany and Slovakia nearly ratified it and the rejection
of the Constitution by the French public (55%) and the Netherlands (61,6%) -
two key founders of E.U. - resulted in a process of cancelling by the other
states such as Czech Republic, Denmark, Ireland, Poland, Portugal, Sweden and
U.K.
In
what regards my opinion, I disagree with the project of E.U. Constitution
because inspite the 'intergovernmental pillars' of the present E.U.
(where member states still retain their sovereignty - in relation with national
policy on health, education, social security, culture, the area of crime and
justice, on foreign and military matters), the 'Community pillar' is
the one that matters more. We have the European Community that cover mainly the
economic and single market area, including the euro-currency and his Commission
that will have the exclusive right to propose European Community's laws. What
with sovereignty? It's all just propaganda from the referendums that were
supported with the money of the voters to the process of transforming E.U. in a
supranational entity that will be 'The State'. We all believed that
after the Nice Treaty all the countries will have equal rights and liberties
(we can take as an further example the citizenship - all had to believe that
after their country is accepted, enters in E.U., will become E.U citizens but
this is just a lie intended to mislead us). Why this lie was necessary? This
was made in order to create the illusion that nothing bad will come up after
the Constitution will be ratified. Also it was stated at the Nice Treaty, that
all member states will be equally represented, but in fact just the strongest
(or populated) will have their say. When I say that, I mean that countries such
as Germany and France will be the ones that will impose their opinions rather
than the common laws passed by the other member states. This delusion of a
Federative state can be observed by everyone interested, if they want. 'We
know that nine out of ten people will not have read the Constitution and will
vote on the basis of what politicians and journalists say. More than that, if
the answer is No, the vote will probably have to be done again, because it
absolutely has to be Yes' (these are the words of Jean-Luc Dehaene, Former
Belgian Prime Minister and Vice-President of the E.U. Convention, published in
Irish Times, 2.06.2004). So, if we aren't blind, the E.U. Constitution would
have made us after the ratification, citizens of the E.U. not before as we
think and the State called E.U. would have become a legal representative in the
world of the 450 millions people that joined and enjoyed of their 'well-deserved
rights'. The rejection by France and Netherlands is nothing more than a
delay of the plans of the bureaucrats. This is a conclusion that can be easily
'extracted' if we read with the mind clear what Dehaene said. Those
animated by idealistic projects should twice put the problems in the light of
what posterity will say if we will be catch in this trap. We will loose our
rights in time and nothing will stop them in the process of transforming E.U.
in a dictatorial state, sort of Fascist one. Our lives are at stake, so we must
let our dreams aside and face the cruel reality and stop this almighty
propaganda machine. I vote No for Constitution but Yes for the individual right
to a opinion.
4. The Romanian parliament ratified the constitution
on 17 May 2005, as part of its preparations for joining the EU on 1 January
2007. So what does it matter if the accession in the Euro area was conditioned
by our previous commitment to this Constitution? It wasn't our choice but a
preliminary step toward integration. We wanted so badly to be a part of E.U.
but the politicians had to face 'Community acquis' that covered
fields as right for intellectual property, rules for the public acquisition,
state supports and competition, corruption fighting, environment and frontier
control.
In what regards my opinion,
Romania wasn't prepared to enter in E.U., but geopolitical factors influenced
the balance in our favour. Our politicians wanted to benefit because Romania
becoming a full member would have had obtained positions in the European Commission.
But wasn't just about looking forward to represent us in front of Europe, but
also a chance to profit of the huge amounts of money that came up and
corruption was increasing and scandals also.
