As already
explained, in Biblical times, the Hebrews used the letters of their alphabet as
numbers. The Hebrew alphabet is quite different from the English alphabet and a
few of these differences should be noted.
|
The Hebrew Alphabet does not have a full range of vowels in its
characters, rather most of the vowel sounds are indicated by marks above or
below the letters they are associated with.
|
|
Some of the letters are written differently if they are the last
letter of the word. They are pronounced the same, they just look different.
These letters are called 'finals'. Thus we may have the letter
'mem' and a 'final mem'.
|
|
Finally it should be remembered that, unlike English, Hebrew
reads from right to left.
|
The letters of the Hebrew alphabet and their
numeric values are shown below. The five finals are at the end of the table and
are indicated by asterisk.
Aleph
Beth
Gimel
Daleth
He
Vau
Zayin
Cheth
Teth
Yod
Kaph
Lamed
Mem
Nun
|
|
|
Samech
Ayin
Pe
Tsaddi
Koph
Resh
Shin
Tau
Koph *
Mem *
Nun *
Pe *
Tsaddi *
|
|
|
Thus anything
written in Hebrew can have a numeric value calculated for it. However it should
be noted that Ivan Panin did not use the values of the finals in his
calculation of numeric values. He would use the numeric value of the normal
letter instead of the final. He claimed that this gave results which fitted his
heptadiac (sevens) structure for scripture, and the presence of this structure
was proof that the finals should not be used.
I am not sure that
his reasoning is valid, it seems to be a bit of a
circular argument to me. There is a particularly good example in the names of
Jesus in the Greek, which shows a significant symbolism that uses both of these
numeric schemes. There is a symbolic pattern if the finals numeric values are
used, and another if they are not. The two symbolisms complement each other. To
me this indicates that there may be significant symbolism in calculating the
numerics both ways. The Greek example is discussed in more detail in the
'Introduction to Greek Numerics'. I am not yet aware of such a good example in
the Hebrew, but nevertheless I am inclined to think that the one argument
should apply to the entire Bible.